Exhaustive packing entry and reassessment powers shape concessional tax coverage, while interest on delayed tax payment is upheld.

The expression "that is to say" in a packing material notification was treated as exhaustive, so the concessional entry could not be expanded beyond the listed goods. Waterproof paper was covered as bituminised packing material, butter paper was not covered, and PVC bags and poly propylene bags qualified only from 5 March 1979 when the entry was substituted to include plastic packing materials. The Rajasthan HC also noted that reassessment under section 12 could be initiated where tax had been assessed at too low a rate, and that the availability of an alternative remedy did not by itself bar reopening. Interest under section 11B was upheld as part of the tax recovery mechanism.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the words "that is to say" in item 8 of the packing material notification made the list of goods exhaustive or illustrative, and whether waterproof paper, PVC bags, poly propylene bags and butter paper fell within that entry. (ii) Whether reassessment under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could be initiated on the basis of the audit objection and alleged under-assessment despite availability of an alternative remedy. (iii) Whether levy of interest under section 11B and the connected challenge to the interest provision could be sustained.

Issue (i): Whether the words "that is to say" in item 8 of the packing material notification made the list of goods exhaustive or illustrative, and whether waterproof paper, PVC bags, poly propylene bags and butter paper fell within that entry.

Analysis: The expression "that is to say" was treated as exhaustive in the context of a sales tax entry specifying separate taxable goods. Each enumerated item was held to be a distinct species of packing material, and the entry could not be expanded beyond the specified sub-items. On facts, butter paper was not mentioned in any sub-item and was held outside the concessional entry. Waterproof paper was held to be bituminised packing material covered by the relevant sub-item. PVC bags and poly propylene bags were not covered before the substitution made on 5 March 1979, but after that date they fell within "plastic packing materials" and were entitled to the concessional rate for the relevant period.

Conclusion: The entry was exhaustive. Waterproof paper was covered by the notification. Butter paper was not covered. PVC bags and poly propylene bags were covered only from 5 March 1979.

Issue (ii): Whether reassessment under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could be initiated on the basis of the audit objection and alleged under-assessment despite availability of an alternative remedy.

Analysis: The power under section 12 was held wide enough to reopen an assessment where tax had been assessed at too low a rate. The reopening was not treated as a mere change of opinion or as lacking jurisdiction, because there was prima facie reason to reassess when goods had been taxed at a concessional rate though they were not expressly covered by the notification. The availability of an appellate remedy was not treated as an absolute bar where the matter was examined on merits in the special appeal.

Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were not held to be without jurisdiction on the ground of alternative remedy or mere change of opinion.

Issue (iii): Whether levy of interest under section 11B and the connected challenge to the interest provision could be sustained.

Analysis: Interest on delayed payment of tax was treated as an integral part of the recovery mechanism and not as an unconstitutional exaction. The challenge to the interest levy was rejected, though the rate or computation for a particular period could still be examined by the assessing authority if required.

Conclusion: The levy of interest under section 11B was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The reassessment was sustained in part, but the demand was set aside to the extent it wrongly denied concessional tax on waterproof paper and on PVC and poly propylene bags for the period covered by the amended entry, while the challenge to butter paper and to the interest provision failed.

Ratio Decidendi: In a taxing entry introduced by the words "that is to say", the specified goods are ordinarily exhaustive, and a reassessment may validly be made where goods have been assessed at too low a rate and the original assessment did not correctly apply the notification.

---