Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manure mixture composed of one or more chemical fertilisers mentioned in item 21 of the First Schedule is itself a chemical fertiliser falling within that entry and liable to tax as a first sale, or whether its sale can be treated as a second sale of the underlying fertilisers and therefore exempt.
Analysis: Item 21 uses the expression "chemical fertilisers" in wide terms, and the words "that is to say" were held not to be words of limitation. A mixture prepared from articles falling within sub-items (1) to (15) does not retain the same commercial identity as the individual components if it acquires different chemical properties and is dealt with in commerce as a distinct product. The principle that a second sale exemption requires identity of goods at the earlier and later stages was applied, and the mixture was treated as a different commodity from its components. The fact that the process may or may not amount to manufacture was considered immaterial to the classification issue.
Conclusion: The manure mixture is a chemical fertiliser within item 21 and cannot be treated as a second sale of the same goods; the finding of the Tribunal was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a mixture of goods covered by a taxing entry acquires a distinct commercial identity and different properties, its sale is not a second sale of the original goods merely because its components were taxed earlier.