Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dismissal of the special appeal as incompetent for want of verification by the original assessing authority was justified, and whether the alleged defect in verification was a curable irregularity requiring an opportunity to rectify it.
Analysis: The appeal had been instituted by the competent assessing authority, and the objection related only to the form of verification. Such a defect, if any, did not affect the maintainability of the appeal on merits and was at most a procedural irregularity capable of being cured. Before rejecting the appeal on that ground, the authority ought to have afforded an opportunity to have the verification properly made. The offered additional verification by the original assessing authority reinforced that the defect could be regularised and that dismissal without such opportunity was unwarranted.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the special appeal for defective verification was unsustainable, and the revision was allowed in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back for verification to be cured and for the special appeal to be decided afresh on merits in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A defect in verification of an otherwise competent appeal is only a curable procedural irregularity, and the party must be given an opportunity to remedy it before the appeal is rejected as incompetent.