Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied where duty-paid inputs were sent for intermediate processing to a job worker and were received back for use in the manufacture of the final product.
Analysis: The credit scheme under the Cenvat Rules permits a manufacturer of final products to avail credit on duty paid inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, including inputs used in intermediate products processed by a job worker and received back for further manufacture. The revenue's reliance on the restriction concerning an independent texturiser was rejected because the assessee was not functioning as an independent texturiser and was not clearing the processed yarn as such. The decisive factors were that the inputs were duty paid, were sent only for intermediate processing, and were ultimately used in the manufacture of duty paid final products. The scheme being beneficial in nature, the entitlement to input duty credit could not be denied on a narrow or technical construction when the substantive conditions were satisfied.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to avail the Cenvat credit on the inputs sent for intermediate job work and received back for manufacture of the final product; the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.