Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be demanded from the assessee from 1st June, 1976, after the tax rate on silicate was corrected, when the Tribunal had found that the assessee bona fide believed the applicable rate to be 4 per cent.
Analysis: The revision turned on the distinction between rectification of an apparent mistake in assessment and the liability to pay interest. The correction of the rate under section 22 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was permissible, but the demand of interest depended on the assessee's intention. The Tribunal's finding that the assessee honestly believed the rate to be 4 per cent, coupled with the fact that the assessing authority itself had originally applied that rate without objection from the department, negatived any mala fide conduct. On those findings, interest from 1st June, 1976, was not justified.
Conclusion: The demand of interest from 1st June, 1976, was not sustainable and the finding was in favour of the assessee.