Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 14(8)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was leviable when the assessee failed to file returns under a bona fide mistake, so as to attract the proviso to section 14(8).
Analysis: The question whether the assessee acted under a bona fide mistake was treated as essentially one of fact. The Tribunal examined the explanation that the assessee was not on the departmental rolls earlier and that there was genuine controversy whether the supply of stone ballast amounted to a sale or a works contract. On that basis, it recorded a reasoned finding that the default was not deliberate and that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the proviso to section 14(8). No compelling reason was shown to disturb that factual conclusion in revision.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable, and the finding of bona fide mistake was upheld.