Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transaction value of the imported equipment could be rejected and enhanced on the basis of another importer's value, and whether project consultancy charges paid under a separate contract for post-import installation and commissioning were includible in the assessable value.
Analysis: The imported goods and the goods relied upon for comparison were found not to be comparable, so enhancement of value on that basis was not justified. The consultancy charges related to post-import activities and were covered by a separate contract. They were distinct from the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods and did not form a condition of sale. The additions permitted under the valuation rules must be supported by objective and quantifiable data, and only those charges falling within the rule could be included.
Conclusion: The enhancement of value was unsustainable and the project consultancy charges were not includible in the assessable value.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Charges for post-import services under a separate and distinct contract, which are not a condition of sale and are not objectively attributable to the imported goods, cannot be added to the assessable value; comparable-import based enhancement is impermissible where the goods are not shown to be comparable.