Tribunal grants waiver of duty & penalty due to Cenvat credit transfer after merger

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounting to Rs. 3,15,170/- due to the transfer of Cenvat credit following the merger of units. The Commissioner (Appeals) had initially denied the credit for lack of supporting documents under Rule 11, but the Tribunal determined that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the waiver. As a result, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived pending the appeal's disposal, and the stay application was approved.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty based on the transfer of Cenvat credit due to merger of units.

Analysis:
The applicant filed an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 3,15,170/- and an equal penalty. The applicant's unit was merged with another unit, and the Cenvat credit of Rs. 3,15,170.00 was transferred as a result of the merger. The Commissioner (Appeals) denied the credit, stating that the applicant failed to produce necessary documents under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The applicant argued that the merger was conducted under Rule 10 of the Rules, and there was no provision to issue documents under Rule 10. The department contended that without supporting documents, the transfer of credit could not be verified, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was correct in requiring documents under Rule 11 to support the credit transfer.

The Tribunal examined Rule 10 (3), which stipulates that the transfer of Cenvat credit is permissible only if the stocks of inputs or capital goods are also transferred along with the factory or business premises to the new site or ownership, and the inputs or capital goods on which credit was availed are duly verified by the appropriate authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) highlighted the necessity of compliance with Rule 11, which mandates that no excisable goods shall be removed from a factory without an invoice. The applicant had provided details of the transferred goods and intimated the department about the Cenvat credit transfer, but the Commissioner (Appeals) insisted on compliance with Rule 11 for the transfer of credit based on invoices.

Ultimately, the Tribunal found that the applicant had made a prima facie case for the waiver of the entire amount of duty and penalty. Consequently, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived until the appeal's disposal, and the stay application was granted. The order was dictated and pronounced in open court on 7-8-2009.

---