Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transport charges separately charged by the dealer for delivery of bricks to the customer's site were deductible under rule 6(c) while computing taxable turnover.
Analysis: Rule 6(c) is intended to exclude transport charges from taxable turnover where freight forms part of the overall consideration but is shown separately and not merged in the sale price. A deduction cannot be denied merely because the contract contemplates delivery at the customer's work-spot, if the transport charges are in fact separately recovered in each transaction. The contrary view rests on a misreading of the rule and a mistaken assumption that separate charging becomes irrelevant whenever delivery is to a place other than the kiln site. On the facts found, the freight was separately charged and therefore fell within the rule.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction of the transport charges under rule 6(c), and the inclusion of those charges in the taxable turnover was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where transport charges are part of the consideration but are separately recovered and not included in the sale price, they are deductible in computing taxable turnover under the relevant sales tax rule.