Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revising authority could initiate proceedings under section 21(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 on the basis of material appearing in the assessment record and make further inquiry, or whether it was confined only to the record without any scope for such inquiry.
Analysis: The record before the Assessing Authority showed suspicious features and indicated that certain transactions appeared to be bogus. The revising authority did not act on fresh information received from outside the record so as to reopen the assessment under the wrong provision. Instead, it proceeded on what was already available in the assessment record and made further inquiry only into matters germane to the turnover already recorded. Such inquiry was within revisional competence and did not amount to an impermissible exercise of reopening the assessment on the basis of new material.
Conclusion: The revising authority was competent to issue the notice and proceed under section 21(1); the challenge to the notice failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In revisional proceedings, further inquiry is permissible where it is founded on suspicious features already appearing in the assessment record and is confined to the turnover on record, but not where the authority seeks to introduce fresh material to reopen the assessment.