Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for claiming concessional rate of tax on Government sales, the assessee was entitled to fill up any one of the alternative particulars in Form D, namely purchase order number and date, purchase as per bill/cash memo number and date, or supply under challan number and date.
Analysis: Form D contained three alternative columns intended to identify the transaction by any one of the specified particulars. The assessee had duly filled in the purchase order number and date, and the record also showed that this information was accepted as correct. Once one of the alternative modes of identification was properly completed and the remaining particulars were struck off, the form could not be treated as incomplete. The requirement of law was satisfied by furnishing any one of the prescribed sets of particulars, and the claim for concessional rate could not be rejected merely because the other alternatives were left blank.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to furnish any one of the three specified particulars in Form D, and the claim for concessional rate under section 8(1)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act was valid.