Prima facie questionable Customs penalty led to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.

In a Customs Act penalty dispute, the pre-deposit requirement was waived and recovery stayed where the record did not clearly establish the appellant's named role in examining and assessing foreign parcels. The materials suggested, at most, negligence rather than abetment, making the penalty under Section 112(a) prima facie questionable; accordingly, the demand was kept in abeyance pending disposal of the appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 should be waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.

Analysis: The appellant was penalised for alleged failure to examine and assess foreign parcels, but the material on record did not clearly establish his role by name. On the available facts, the conduct appeared at most to suggest negligence rather than abetment, and the penalty was found to be prima facie questionable.

Outcome: Pre-deposit of the penalty was waived and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeals.

---