Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under the transitional provision could be denied for delayed filing of the declaration despite availability of duty-paid documents and stock of inputs on the relevant date.
Analysis: Rule 9A of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was treated as a transitional provision introduced in consequence of levy of excise duty on grey fabrics. The rule required a declaration of stock of inputs by the prescribed date and availability of documents evidencing actual payment of duty. The documents were available and the declaration had been filed, though belatedly for stated reasons. On these facts, the delayed declaration did not justify denial of credit, but it did warrant penal consequences.
Conclusion: Credit could not be denied on the ground of delayed declaration, and the assessee remained liable only to a reduced penalty.
Final Conclusion: The denial of credit was set aside, the penalty was reduced, and the connected order passed on the basis of utilisation of the denied credit was also set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the substantive conditions for transitional credit are satisfied and the required declaration is filed belatedly, credit should not be denied solely for delay, though a penalty may be imposed for non-compliance with the prescribed time limit.