Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gur badda was liable to be treated as molasses for the purpose of sales tax, or as a different commodity taxable at the lower rate applicable to gur.
Analysis: The question turned on the proper classification of gur badda. The Court noted that the commodity had already been distinguished from molasses in earlier authority and that the department itself accepted that, if gur badda was not molasses, it would attract the lower rate applicable in the relevant year. The Court therefore declined to go into the further question whether gur badda was the same as gur, and confined its answer to the issue referred.
Conclusion: Gur badda was not molasses. The assessee's turnover of gur badda was taxable only at 2 per cent and not at 3 per cent.