Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether prosecution of sales tax officers for acts done in the course of inspection and verification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was barred for want of previous sanction under section 51.
Analysis: The bar under section 51 applies where there is a reasonable and sufficient connection between the act complained of and the discharge of official duty. The power under section 29A to stop vehicles, verify documents under section 29(2), and ascertain whether tax has been evaded includes verification of the transaction even where the goods have already been removed and the entries in the bill book require checking with the alleged purchasers. An act does not cease to be one done in the course of official duty merely because it may have been excessive, provided it is so interrelated with the statutory function that it can reasonably be said to have been done in purported exercise of that power.
Conclusion: Previous sanction of the Government was required before launching the prosecution, and in its absence the prosecution could not proceed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the act complained of has a reasonable nexus with the discharge or purported discharge of official duty, prior sanction is mandatory even if the act is alleged to be in excess of authority.