Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether impregnated filter paper was excluded from the exemption under Notification No. 8/96 and the corresponding tariff entry only because it was impregnated, or whether exclusion applied only when sheets of paper or paper board were compressed together in one or more operations.
Analysis: The exclusionary description in the notification and the tariff entry covered products consisting of sheets of paper or paper board impregnated, coated or covered with plastics and compressed together in one or more operations. The materials on record showed impregnation, but there was no evidence that the goods were made of two or more sheets compressed together. Mere impregnation, by itself, did not satisfy the exclusion clause. Since the show cause notices proceeded only on impregnation and not on compression of sheets, the goods did not fall within the excluded category.
Conclusion: The exemption was not denied merely because the filter paper was impregnated. The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification and the classification adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption exclusion referring to products of sheets of paper or paper board impregnated and compressed together applies only when the compression requirement is also satisfied; mere impregnation is insufficient to deny the benefit.