Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority was bound to decide the assessee's application under the proviso to section 20(5) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act before taking up the appeal on merits, and whether recovery of the assessed tax should remain stayed until that application was decided.
Analysis: Section 20 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act has to be read as a whole, and the proviso appended to it must be given a proper meaning. The appellate authority cannot prolong consideration of the appeal without first deciding the application by which the assessee seeks relief under the proviso to section 20(5). If that application is not decided first, the statutory remedy of appeal would be rendered illusory and the assessed tax may be recovered coercively before the appeal is effectively heard.
Conclusion: The application under the proviso to section 20(5) had to be decided before the appeal on merits was taken up, and the recovery of tax was directed to remain stayed until that decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing statute provides a proviso enabling interim relief to an assessee, the appellate authority must first decide that relief application before proceeding with the appeal on merits, so that the appeal does not become ineffective by premature recovery of tax.