Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales effected by endorsement of railway receipts during transit from Bombay to Kerala fell within section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and, if so, whether Tamil Nadu was the State competent to levy and collect tax under section 9(1) of that Act.
Analysis: The goods were delivered to the common carrier for transmission to Kerala, and the railway receipts were endorsed after the goods had been put on board the train but before delivery to the purchaser. On the contract terms, the goods were identified by description, supplied in conformity with the contract, and treated as ascertained or ascertainable goods appropriated to the contract when the documents were endorsed. The circumstance that payment and final acceptance followed later did not postpone the transfer of property so as to take the transaction outside section 3(b). Since the assessee had obtained the prescribed form in Tamil Nadu in connection with the purchase from Bombay, the case attracted the proviso to section 9(1), making this State the State from which the subsequent sale was effected and therefore the State entitled to levy and collect the tax. Section 6(2) was not applicable.
Conclusion: The sales fell within section 3(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and Tamil Nadu was competent to assess and collect the tax under section 9(1), proviso.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are ascertained or ascertainable, and documents of title are endorsed after delivery to the carrier but before delivery to the purchaser, the transaction is a sale during movement of goods within section 3(b), and the proviso to section 9(1) governs the State entitled to levy and collect the tax on a subsequent inter-State sale.