Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sugar-candy was liable to sales tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, or whether it was exempt as falling within the meaning of sugar in the exempted schedule entries.
Analysis: The liability under section 6 attached to declared goods at the rate and point specified in the Third Schedule, and sugar-candy was specifically entered as a taxable item. Although sugar was a declared good and was exempted under section 8 read with the Fourth Schedule, the statutory scheme treated sugar and sugar-candy separately. The definitions traced through the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 did not compel sugar-candy to be treated as sugar for exemption purposes. The two expressions were understood in common parlance as distinct substances, and the legislature had intentionally differentiated them by placing them in different schedules.
Conclusion: Sugar-candy was taxable and did not enjoy the exemption available to sugar.