Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dry-cells used in hearing-aids were accessories of hearing-aids and therefore covered by the exemption granted under G.O. Ms. No. 976, Revenue, dated 28th March, 1959, instead of being treated as electrical goods.
Analysis: The goods in question were dry-cells used in hearing-aids. Hearing-aids could not be used without those cells, and in that context the cells were rightly regarded as accessories of hearing-aids. Since the exemption order covered sales of electrical hearing-aids and accessories, the Tribunal's view that the sales fell within the exemption was found to be correct and no error was shown in its approach.
Conclusion: The goods were accessories of hearing-aids and were covered by the exemption. The assessee's challenge failed.