Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund applications were premature in the absence of a final order passed by the Tribunal under section 24(5) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The reference made on the taxability of the contract work resulted only in a decision on the question of law, and under section 24(5) the Tribunal was still required to pass the final order in accordance with that decision. Until such final order was made, any application for refund based on the reference decision could not be treated as ripe for consideration. The court further noted that any view taken on such premature applications would not operate against the parties when a proper claim for refund is made after the Tribunal's final order.
Conclusion: The refund applications were premature and not be entertained.