Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the supply of fertilisers by the mills to cane-growers constituted sales liable to tax. (ii) Whether the sale of press-mud, a by-product arising in the course of manufacture of sugar, was taxable even though the mills did not deal in that commodity.
Issue (i): Whether the supply of fertilisers by the mills to cane-growers constituted sales liable to tax.
Analysis: The supplies involved transfer of property in goods for a price and were recorded in the mills' accounts as sales. The bye-laws did not make the mills an agent of the members for purchasing fertilisers; they merely enabled cash advances, and the kind component could not alter the true character of the transaction. The sales were also connected with the mills' business after the statutory amendment expanding the concept of business.
Conclusion: The supply of fertilisers was a sale and was liable to tax, in favour of Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the sale of press-mud, a by-product arising in the course of manufacture of sugar, was taxable even though the mills did not deal in that commodity.
Analysis: Press-mud arose as a by-product in the course of the mills' manufacturing activity. Once sold, it was connected with the business of the assessee, and it was unnecessary that the mills should carry on a separate business in that commodity for the sale to be exigible to tax.
Conclusion: The sale of press-mud was taxable, in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessments were upheld because both the fertiliser supplies and the sale of press-mud were treated as taxable transactions connected with the business of the mills.
Ratio Decidendi: After the statutory expansion of the concept of business, a sale is taxable if the goods sold are connected with the dealer's business, even if the dealer does not ordinarily trade in that particular commodity.