Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revising authority had jurisdiction to entertain a revision against a show cause notice issued under section 15-A(c) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The revisional power under section 10(3) extends only to examining the legality or propriety of an order made by an appellate or assessing authority. A notice issued under section 15-A(c) is only an intimation calling upon the dealer to show cause before penalty is imposed, and is not itself an order. The statutory scheme distinguishes between the notice initiating penalty proceedings and the final order, if any, imposing penalty. Since the revising authority can interfere only with an order and not with an antecedent notice, it had no jurisdiction at the stage when the notice was challenged.
Conclusion: The revision against the notice was not maintainable, and the answer to the referred question is in the negative, in favour of the department and against the assessee.