Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a processor of fabrics on job work basis was entitled to deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 29/96-CE (NT) when grey fabrics were received first and semi-processed fabrics were sent to another job worker for an intermediate process before completion of processing.
Analysis: The notification granted deemed credit for dyes, chemicals and consumables used in the manufacture of processed fabrics, but its Explanation II excluded cases where processed fabrics were used as an input for further processing. The Tribunal held that the assessee had initially received grey fabrics and the return of partly processed fabrics from another job worker after an intermediate process did not amount to receipt of processed fabrics within the meaning of the exclusion. The exclusion could not be construed so as to defeat the benefit merely because one intermediate process was outsourced on job work basis.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of deemed Modvat credit and the denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.