Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unrefunded deposits taken for bottles and wooden casks used to supply liquor and beer represented turnover from a sale of the containers, or whether the transaction was one of bailment.
Analysis: The arrangement for wooden casks showed that property in the casks was not intended to pass to the purchaser, since the purchaser was entitled to return them and, if retained beyond the stipulated period, was liable only to pay hire. The absence of a fixed time-limit for return and the continuing liability to hire were inconsistent with a conditional sale and indicated that the casks remained the assessee's property. The country liquor bottle arrangement under the excise rules was similar: the purchaser paid the cost of the bottles separately, was entitled to refund on returning them in sound condition, and the rules did not indicate any sale of the containers. The beer bottle arrangement was found on the facts to be substantially the same. The deposits were taken as security against loss of containers, not as price, and the containers were meant to be returned after use.
Conclusion: The unrefunded amounts could not be treated as turnover from sale of the containers; the transactions were bailments and not sales.