Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether metal polishing compositions or metal polishing bars could be treated as soap under item 37 of the First Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the reassessment under section 16 of that Act was valid.
Analysis: The products in question, though soap-like in shape, were found to have a distinct and different utility from ordinary soap. They were used mainly for polishing stainless steel and other hard surfaces, and not for washing or cleansing, which is the normal and popular use of soap. The subsequent legislative amendment, which expressly included metal polishing bars within the entry, indicated that such articles were not clearly covered by the earlier wording. In taxing statutes, liability cannot be imposed by implication or intendment, and an ambiguous entry cannot support reopening on the footing that the goods were already taxable under that entry.
Conclusion: The metal polishing compositions or bars were not soap within item 37 before the amendment, and the reassessment under section 16 was without jurisdiction and invalid.