Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether materials used in the construction of a road under the contract constituted a taxable sale under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, and whether the assessment orders could stand without a clear analysis of the agreement and the passing of title to the movables.
Analysis: A road is immovable property, and sales tax can be levied only on sale of movables. Where the agreement is for construction of a road and the materials supplied are merely constituents used in that construction, the question is whether the goods passed to the purchaser as movables independent of the construction contract or only as part of the immovable property. The assessment order did not clearly examine the agreement or distinguish between a separate supply contract and a construction contract, so the legal position was not properly appreciated.
Conclusion: The materials used in road construction were not automatically liable to sales tax; the assessing authority must determine whether title to the movables passed as part of the construction work or under a separate supply arrangement. The assessment orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh determination.