Survival of penalty liability against a deceased dealer's estate upheld under sales tax rules and statutory scheme.

The Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax framework was read as preserving liability for both tax and penalty against the estate of a deceased dealer. The court reasoned that the rule-making power in section 39 was general and broad enough to support rule 23(1), and that the illustrative reference in section 39(2)(o) to tax did not exclude penalty. It further held that penalty under section 14(2) survives the dealer's death, while the legal representative is not personally liable but must comply with the statutory return obligations. The maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona was held inapplicable where the statute preserves liability.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether rule 23(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957, was ultra vires section 39 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, insofar as it authorised recovery of penalty from the estate of a deceased dealer; and (ii) whether the legal representative of a deceased dealer could be made liable for penalty levied under section 14(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Issue (i): Whether rule 23(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957, was ultra vires section 39 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, insofar as it authorised recovery of penalty from the estate of a deceased dealer.

Analysis: Section 39(1) confers general rule-making power to carry out the purposes of the Act, while section 39(2) gives illustrative instances and is not restrictive of that general power. The scheme of the Act shows that penalty is one of its purposes and that the liability to tax and penalty survives against the estate of a deceased dealer. Rule 23(1) therefore falls within the delegated power, and its reference to penalty does not make it invalid merely because section 39(2)(o) speaks of assessment and recovery of tax.

Conclusion: Rule 23(1) is not ultra vires and is valid.

Issue (ii): Whether the legal representative of a deceased dealer could be made liable for penalty levied under section 14(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: Penalty under the Act is separate from tax, but rule 23(1) expressly fastens the liability on the estate of the deceased dealer, not on the legal representative personally. The legal representative is only required to submit the return and the liability does not disappear on the dealer's death, because the Act and the Rules provide for survival of such liability. The principle of actio personalis moritur cum persona does not apply where the statute preserves the liability.

Conclusion: The legal representative's estate is liable for the penalty, and the levy is valid.

Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme authorises recovery of both tax and penalty from the estate of a deceased dealer, and the challenge to the penalty levy fails.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the enabling provision confers general rule-making power to carry out the purposes of the Act and the Act itself preserves liability against the estate of a deceased dealer, a rule providing for recovery of penalty from that estate is valid even if the specific illustrative clause mentions tax alone.

---