Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the word "tax" in section 22(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 includes penalty so as to permit a reference to the High Court from an order of the Sales Tax Tribunal imposing penalty.
Analysis: The provision enabling a reference applied to orders affecting liability to pay tax. Penalty under the Act was treated as having a direct connection with the assessed sales tax, being imposed for defaults such as misuse of the registration certificate and recoverable in the same manner as tax. The reasoning drew support from authority treating penalty as an additional tax and from decisions under sales tax legislation where penalty was regarded as integral to the fiscal liability. The contrary view based on the appeal provision in section 20 was held irrelevant because it turned on the wording of a different provision. The Court also noted that excluding penalty from section 22(1) would create an anomalous situation where no effective reference could be made against unlawful penalty orders.
Conclusion: The word "tax" in section 22(1) includes both assessed tax and imposed penalty, and a reference can be sought on questions of law arising from an order imposing penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory penalty is levied as an incident of tax liability and is recoverable in the same manner as tax, the term "tax" in a reference provision may include penalty unless the statute clearly excludes it.