Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 12-A of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, was unconstitutional for conferring power to assess escaped turnover on different authorities in a manner that produced discriminatory treatment between dealers.
Analysis: The impugned provision enabled escaped turnover to be assessed either by the Commercial Tax Officer, the appellate authority, or the revisional authority. A dealer selected by the Commercial Tax Officer could pursue the ordinary appellate hierarchy, but a dealer proceeded against by the Deputy Commissioner under section 12-A could not obtain the same appellate or revisional remedies available under the Act as it then stood. The result was an incongruous and unequal treatment of dealers similarly situated, with no rational basis for the differential procedural consequences. The section therefore conferred power in a manner that was arbitrary and discriminatory.
Conclusion: Section 12-A, as it then stood, was void as offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and the impugned assessment order was liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory provision that permits selection among similarly situated persons for adverse fiscal action, while denying one class the ordinary appellate safeguards available to others, is discriminatory and unconstitutional under Article 14.