Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the period of limitation prescribed for escaped assessment under section 15 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 applies to a best judgment assessment of an unregistered dealer under section 14(6), and to the consequential penalty under section 14(7).
Analysis: The assessment proposed under section 14(6) was treated as an assessment of escaped turnover, because the dealer had failed to register and had submitted no return. The scheme of sections 14 and 15 was read as a whole, and the limitation governing escaped assessment was held to apply to all proceedings whose substance was assessment of escaped turnover. The same reasoning that applied to best judgment assessments of dealers who failed to file returns was extended to an unregistered dealer under section 14(6), since a contrary view would create an incongruous distinction within the same statutory scheme. As the proposed assessment was time-barred under section 15, the penalty under section 14(7), which could arise only in the course of a valid section 14(6) assessment, also could not stand.
Conclusion: The limitation period under section 15 applies to assessment proceedings under section 14(6), and the proposed penalty under section 14(7) is also unavailable where the assessment itself is time-barred.