Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a detailed project report / documentation service formed "plant" within the meaning of section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to qualify for depreciation.
Analysis: The expression "plant" had already been interpreted broadly to include drawings, designs, charts, plans, processing data and other literature comprising documentation service. On that construction, a detailed project report could fall within the statutory definition of "plant" where it served as a tool of the business and not merely as a preliminary paper.
Conclusion: The project report was treated as "plant" and depreciation was allowable. The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of depreciation, documentation embodying technical material and functioning as a business tool may constitute "plant" within section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.