Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while giving effect to appellate orders, the Assessing Officer could withdraw deductions originally allowed under sections 80G and 80HH when those allowances were not the subject matter of the assessee's appeal.
Analysis: The original assessments had allowed the deductions, and the assessee's appeals concerned only other additions and disallowances. The appellate orders did not disturb or withdraw the already-granted deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer was bound to give effect to the appellate orders and could not reopen or withdraw allowances that were neither challenged nor reversed. At the highest, he could recompute the deductions if the appellate relief so required.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of the deductions was not justified, and the Tribunal was right in holding that no valid reason existed to deny the allowances already granted.
Final Conclusion: No referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order, so the petitions for reference failed and were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: An Assessing Officer giving effect to appellate relief cannot withdraw deductions already allowed in the original assessment unless those allowances were themselves put in issue or set aside in appeal.