Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a trust created for the benefit of a beneficiary not yet in existence, described as the first son of a named person, was a valid trust.
Analysis: A valid trust requires certainty of intention, purpose, beneficiaries, trust property, and transfer of property. The beneficiary here was not indefinite or unknown, since the trust deed identified the beneficiary by description. Section 13 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 permits creation of an interest for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of transfer, provided the whole remaining interest is devoted to that benefit. The transfer in question was structured through a trust, which is a recognised mechanism for holding property for the benefit of an unborn person, and the entire interest was intended to enure to the child to be born.
Conclusion: The trust was valid and the reference question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A trust for the benefit of an unborn person is valid where the beneficiary is identified with reasonable certainty and the entire remaining interest is effectively dedicated to that beneficiary through the trust mechanism.