Prima facie Cenvat credit and repair-and-maintenance classification issues led to a stay of recovery pending appeal.

On a prima facie review, the Tribunal found that the assessee's contractual work was mainly market-related support and did not substantially amount to repair and maintenance service, so the demand on that footing was not required to be pressed at the stay stage. It also noted that service centres were engaged to discharge after-sales and warranty obligations, and the services rendered by them had suffered service tax, making the assessee's Cenvat credit claim not plainly untenable at that stage. Recovery was stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the demand raised on the footing that the assessee's activities amounted to repair and maintenance service was fit to be insisted upon at the stay stage. (ii) Whether, on a prima facie view, Cenvat credit could be denied in respect of service tax paid by service centres used for after-sales and warranty obligations.

Analysis: The agreement placed before the Tribunal showed that the assessee's contractual activities were principally market-related and support functions, and did not, on a prima facie view, disclose substantial repair and maintenance activity. The order under challenge had not minutely analysed any alleged repair component. As to the credit issue, the Tribunal referred to the definition of input service and noted that the assessee had engaged service centres to discharge contractual after-sales and warranty obligations, and that the services rendered by those centres had suffered service tax.

Outcome: The demand relating to repair and maintenance was not required to be insisted upon at that stage, and the denial of Cenvat credit was also held to be not impermissible prima facie. Recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.

---