Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was rightly dismissed as time-barred for having been filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation under Section 84 of the Finance Act.
Analysis: The appeal had been filed beyond the initial period of three months and also beyond the further period of three months that could be condoned by the Commissioner (Appeals). The order recorded that the appellate authority had no power to condone delay beyond the statutory limit, and therefore the dismissal for want of limitation was in accordance with the governing legal framework.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal as time-barred was upheld, and the appellant obtained no relief.