Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed inputs and capital goods, and whether credit was rightly denied only for the maintenance paints and related items.
Analysis: The disputed inputs such as aquachem, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, activated alumina, servo press, oil and grease were found to be used in the manufacturing process or for keeping the manufacturing machinery functional, and were therefore eligible for Modvat credit. The items described as industrial cylinder valves, heat exchangers, circuit breakers, conductive cables, cryogenic tanks, water pumps and pipes, carbon filled PTFE rings, HP cylinders, aluminium sheets in coils, PTFE piston rings, storage tanks, horizontal bulk tanks and related spares were treated as capital goods because they were machines, equipment, plant, apparatus, accessories, spares or components used for producing or processing goods or for storing process materials. The electrical devices in items 20 to 33 were also held to fall within capital goods under the applicable legal test. By contrast, red oxide, synthetic enamel black paint, zinc chromate, yellow primer and enamel were used only for surface coating and maintenance of machinery and did not qualify as inputs or capital goods for credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all disputed items except red oxide, synthetic enamel black paint, zinc chromate, yellow primer and enamel, on which credit was rightly disallowed.