Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the embroidery arrangement was a works contract or a composite contract comprising a sale of jari materials and a contract for work.
Analysis: The decisive test was the true nature and substance of the bargain, namely whether the parties intended a sale of materials as such or whether the dominant object was execution of embroidery work. Mere inclusion of the cost of jari in the consolidated charge, or the fact that property in the materials passed with the finished sari, was not enough unless there was an express or implied agreement to sell the materials. On the facts, the customer engaged the applicants to do embroidery work on supplied sari pieces, and the use of jari was only incidental to the service undertaken. The consolidated bill and surrounding circumstances did not show a separable agreement for sale of jari materials.
Conclusion: The agreement was a contract of work and labour and not a composite contract involving a sale of jari materials; the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A contract is taxable as a sale of materials only where, on a true construction, there is an express or implied agreement to sell the materials as such; mere passing of property in materials used in performing a service contract does not constitute a sale if the materials are merely ancillary to the work.