Natural justice requires disclosure of adverse inquiry material, while an appellate tribunal may decide an ex parte appeal on the record.
Material gathered in a private inquiry cannot be used against an assessee unless its substance is disclosed and an effective opportunity to rebut it is given; failure to do so breaches natural justice and invalidates the first appellate order. By contrast, where the appellant remains absent after due notice, the Tribunal may dispose of the second appeal on the materials properly on record and is not barred from deciding the matter ex parte. The reference was ultimately answered against the assessee, with the dismissal of the applications upheld.
Issues: (i) Whether the first appellate authority violated the principles of natural justice by making a further inquiry and dismissing the appeals without giving the assessee notice of the material gathered and an opportunity to meet it; (ii) Whether the Tribunal was competent to dispose of the second appeals on the materials on record when the appellant remained absent and the matter was heard ex parte.
Issue (i): Whether the first appellate authority violated the principles of natural justice by making a further inquiry and dismissing the appeals without giving the assessee notice of the material gathered and an opportunity to meet it.
Analysis: The appellate authority had power under the rules to make further inquiry, but that power had to be exercised consistently with natural justice. Where the result of a private inquiry is intended to be used against the assessee, the substance of the information must be communicated and an opportunity given to rebut it. The order was also vitiated because the authority did not hear the appellant's arguments, and a hearing by the predecessor could not be treated as a hearing by the successor in these circumstances.
Conclusion: The first appellate order was invalid for breach of natural justice and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the Tribunal was competent to dispose of the second appeals on the materials on record when the appellant remained absent and the matter was heard ex parte.
Analysis: Under the appellate scheme and the rule governing absence of parties, the Tribunal could dismiss the appeal or decide it on merits after hearing the respondent. Since the appellant did not appear, the Tribunal was entitled to decide the matter on the existing record. The reference statement did not establish that the Tribunal relied on any extraneous material outside the record.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was competent to decide the appeals on the materials on record, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and the dismissal of the applications was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Material gathered in a private inquiry cannot be used against an assessee unless its substance is disclosed and an opportunity of rebuttal is afforded, but an appellate tribunal may decide an ex parte appeal on the materials properly on record when the appellant, after due notice, fails to appear.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
