Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could require the Revising Authority to state a case under section 11(4) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act when the assessee's application under section 11(1) was defective and the refusal to state the case was also based on grounds other than the absence of a question of law.
Analysis: The right to move the High Court under section 11(4) arises only where the Revising Authority refuses to state the case solely on the ground that no question of law arises out of its order under section 10. An application under section 11(1) must satisfy the statutory conditions of being in writing, being filed within the prescribed time, and being accompanied by the prescribed fee. Where the application is invalid for failure to comply with those conditions, the Revising Authority may reject it without attracting the High Court's reference jurisdiction. If the Revising Authority dismisses the application on the combined grounds of defect in the application and absence of a question of law, the statutory condition for invoking section 11(4) is not fulfilled.
Conclusion: Section 11(4) was inapplicable and the High Court had no jurisdiction to direct a reference.
Ratio Decidendi: The High Court's reference jurisdiction under section 11(4) is available only when a valid application under section 11(1) is refused solely on the ground that no question of law arises.