Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of penalties imposed under the service tax provisions, in the light of a bona fide dispute on tax liability, payment of tax with interest before the show cause notice, and absence of suppression.
Analysis: The appellant had raised a bona fide doubt regarding service tax liability on processing of MICR cheques. The tax department's clarification on the issue came later, and the appellant discharged the service tax liability for the entire period together with interest before the show cause notice was issued. On these facts, the invocation of suppression and the extended period was not justified for the purpose of insisting on pre-deposit of penalties.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to full waiver of the penalties pending disposal of the appeal, and the stay application was allowed.