Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, a sculptor supplying specially commissioned bronze casts to Government, was a dealer and whether the transactions constituted sales chargeable to tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939.
Analysis: A person becomes a dealer only when the activity of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods is carried on in a commercial sense as part of trade or business. The statutory definition of sale likewise requires a transfer of property in goods in the course of trade or business. The bronze casts were works of art made to special order, having value for their artistic skill rather than for the material used, without any general market or ordinary commercial character. On those facts, the transactions were not in the course of trade or business and did not answer the statutory concept of sale. The alternative contention that the petitioner should be left to the assessing authority was rejected because the notice already disclosed a concluded proposal to treat the petitioner as liable to tax.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not a dealer and the transactions were not sales within the Act; the writ petition succeeded and the assessment was restrained.