Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of photographs and photo copies by a professional photographer in the course of carrying on photography amounts to a sale of goods liable to sales tax, or is merely a contract for work and labour.
Analysis: The activity of a photographer was found to involve a finished product, namely the photograph and copies taken from the negative, in which the materials used became part of the end product. The presence of skill at the stage of taking the photograph did not change the essential character of the transaction, because the bargain was for the supply of the finished article to the customer. The Court held that the business activity had a commercial character and was not interlocked with dealing in photographic materials. Earlier treatment of similar transactions as works contracts was held not to control the present classification, since each transaction had to be judged on its own facts and the existing law. The authorities distinguishing artistic sculpture from ordinary photography were held inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The transaction was held to be a sale of goods and not a contract for work and labour, and the levy of sales tax was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a photographer supplies finished photographs or copies to a customer in the course of business, the transaction is a sale of goods if the substance of the bargain is the delivery of a marketable finished product rather than the rendition of work and labour alone.