Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales of tea were exempt from sales tax under section 5(v) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act when the documents of title were delivered in Madras but the tea itself was delivered in foreign ports.
Analysis: The sales were effected under contracts contemplating shipment for delivery outside the State, with property passing at Madras on delivery of the documents to the bank acting for the buyer. Under section 33 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, delivery may be made by any act which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or a person authorised to hold them on his behalf, and delivery in law was therefore possible. The decisive question was the meaning of "delivery" in section 5(v). Reading the exemption in light of its object of promoting exports, the word could not be confined to documentary or constructive delivery, because that would defeat the legislative purpose and create unequal treatment between similar export sales depending only on the place where documents were handed over.
Conclusion: The word "delivery" in section 5(v) means physical delivery of the tea outside the State, not delivery by documents of title, and the sales were exempt from taxation.
Ratio Decidendi: For an export-oriented sales tax exemption framed in terms of delivery outside the State, "delivery" is confined to actual physical delivery of the goods and does not include delivery in law by transfer of documents of title.