Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended definition of sale in section 2(g) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act was ultra vires to the extent it conflicted with Article 286 of the Constitution of India, and whether sales of goods delivered outside Bihar after 26 January 1950 could be taxed under the Act.
Analysis: The reference turned on the effect of Article 286, which prohibits a State from taxing sales that take place outside the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, subject to the constitutional saving then available under the President's Sales Tax Continuance Order of 1950. The amended definition in section 2(g) deemed certain sales to have taken place in Bihar even where delivery or the contract occurred elsewhere, and the assessment sought to bring outside-Bihar deliveries within the State's taxing power. In view of the controlling Supreme Court decisions relied upon, the challenged definition could operate only so far as it did not contravene Article 286, and sales of goods delivered outside the State after the commencement of the Constitution could not be subjected to Bihar sales tax.
Conclusion: The amended definition of sale was ultra vires to the extent it contravened Article 286 of the Constitution of India, and the assessee was not liable to tax on sales of goods delivered outside Bihar after 26 January 1950.