Distinct taxable events justify concurrent excise duty and sales tax, while unlisted licence fees remain non-deductible from turnover.

Excise duty and sales tax were treated as distinct imposts because they arise from different taxable events: excise attaches to manufacture or production, while sales tax attaches to the sale transaction. The constitutional scheme permits both levies to operate simultaneously, so the levy of sales tax in addition to excise duty on liquor transactions was legally valid. Separately, a licence fee paid for liquor, drug and opium shops was not deductible in computing net turnover because Rule 44 allows only deductions expressly listed in it, and the fee did not fall within any permitted category. The application therefore failed on both issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the State Legislature had competence to levy sales tax in addition to excise duty on liquor transactions; (ii) Whether licence fee paid for liquor, drug and opium shops was deductible while computing net turnover under the Sales Tax Act.

Issue (i): Whether the State Legislature had competence to levy sales tax in addition to excise duty on liquor transactions.

Analysis: Excise duty and sales tax operate on different taxable events. Excise duty is imposed on manufacture or production, while sales tax is levied on the transaction of sale. The constitutional scheme permits the State Legislature to levy both kinds of imposts, and there is no constitutional prohibition against their simultaneous incidence. The question whether such dual taxation is equitable is one of policy and not of legal competence.

Conclusion: The levy of sales tax in addition to excise duty was held to be legally competent and valid.

Issue (ii): Whether licence fee paid for liquor, drug and opium shops was deductible while computing net turnover under the Sales Tax Act.

Analysis: Rule 44 prescribes the amounts that may be deducted in arriving at net turnover from gross turnover. The licence fee did not fall within any of the deductions specified in the rule, nor could it be brought within any of its sub-rules. Accordingly, it was not deductible for the purpose of computing taxable turnover.

Conclusion: The licence fee was held not to be deductible from turnover.

Final Conclusion: No question of law warranting a reference was shown, and the application failed on both grounds.

Ratio Decidendi: Excise duty and sales tax are distinct levies on different taxable events, and deductions from turnover can be allowed only when expressly authorised by the governing rule.

---