Section 68 unexplained credit addition upheld where alleged loans were found to be mere paper entries.

Section 68 addition was sustained where the Tribunal found the alleged loan credits to be unconvincing and unsupported by proof. The explanation for Rs. 54,000 failed because the creditor did not show the borrowers were known to him, the dates of advance were not disclosed, and no interest was charged despite the claimed advances; the Tribunal treated the entry as a paper transaction. As nothing was produced to dislodge that factual finding, the remaining Rs. 7,000 was also treated as part of the unexplained credit. The challenge to the addition therefore failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 61,000 under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified on the facts found by the Tribunal.

Analysis: The explanation regarding Rs. 54,000 was rejected because the alleged borrowers were not shown to be known to the creditor, the dates of advancement were not disclosed, and no interest was charged despite the claimed advances. The Tribunal recorded a factual finding that the transaction was not believable and was only a paper entry. Nothing was shown to dislodge that finding. The remaining Rs. 7,000 was also treated as part of the unexplained credit and no basis was shown for interference.

Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was upheld and the challenge to it failed.

---