TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC dismisses application for clarification, deems repeated petitions with new counsel as court process abuse.</h1> <h3>Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & Anr Versus N. Raju Reddiar & Anr</h3> The SC dismissed the application for clarification following the dismissal of a review petition, deeming repeated petitions with new counsel as an abuse ... Review petition - Held that:- The failure to obtain the 'No Objection Certificate' from the erstwhile counsel has disentitled him to file the Review Petition. Even otherwise, the Review Petition has no merits, It is an attempt to reargue the matter on merits. Thus dismiss the Review Petition. Once the petition for review is dismissed, no application for clarification should be filed, much less with the change of the advocate-on-record. The Supreme Court dismissed the application for clarification filed after a review petition was dismissed, stating that repeated petitions with change of counsel are an abuse of the court process. The court imposed exemplary costs of Rs.20,000 to be paid to the Supreme Court Legal Aid Services Committee within four months. Failure to pay would result in recovery as a court decree by the Committee.
TaxTMI 
