Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was required to be enhanced to the equivalent of the duty evaded, or whether the reduced penalty imposed by the appellate authority was sustainable when the duty along with interest had been paid before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The clearance of sulphuric acid without payment of duty under parallel invoices was not in dispute. The decisive factor was that the entire duty along with interest had been paid prior to the show cause notice. In such circumstances, the first proviso to Section 11AC applied, and the penal liability was restricted to 25% of the duty amount. The penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was within that limit.
Conclusion: The reduced penalty was upheld and no interference with the appellate order was warranted.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the penalty failed, and the order enhancing the penalty only to a limited amount was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty and interest are paid before issuance of the show cause notice, the first proviso to Section 11AC restricts penalty to 25% of the duty involved.