Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in respect of the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Analysis: The assessee had paid the duty along with interest before issuance of the show-cause notice. The penalty was imposed under Rule 25, while the notice had proposed penalty under Rule 25 and Rule 27 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The challenge raised a prima facie question on the applicability of penalty under Rule 25 and on invocation of sub-rule (2) without a specific notice of the exact contravention. In the absence of contrary binding authority, the record disclosed a prima facie case in favour of the assessee.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in respect of the penalty.